About Me

Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role

The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gaming.

No, they weren't personally in participation, however the world-famous celebs were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial websites using both complimentary casino-style video games and financially rewarding prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to discuss suit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as conventional gambling establishments, just without the oversight, customer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the company deals with accusations of illegal sports betting in a New York claim that claims VGW uses star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm not exactly sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a series of stars from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any differences between conventional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes casinos discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - games are complimentary

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social networks

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads usually focus around the social aspect of the gambling establishments, while omitting the potential for real gaming losses.

Others tempt customers with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement flaunting Drake's cars and trucks, airplanes and estates before pivoting to video of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever quit.'

The disparity between gaming sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, most of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting complimentary.

'Most social sweeps consumers never buy,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social gambling establishments offer clients an opportunity to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the option to purchase worthless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real money, but can be used to open various functions within the games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling customers to get other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for financial losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an ad displaying Drake's vehicles, planes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all however seven states, which has actually helped to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which don't require usually need identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to submit mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, provided the players follow painfully specific guidelines. What's more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins just for registering, therefore providing a factor to try their hands at any variety of gambling establishment games for a chance to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites enabled to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a method of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are merely a type of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever have to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an important distinction between social sweeps and standard online gaming websites like casinos.'

Think about the method that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that provide them the opportunity to win lucrative rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself does not meet the definition of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all sort of everyday organizations in the United States, everything from hamburgers to publication memberships to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to many sports betting market experts, that argument does not cut it.

For starters, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined beginning and end, consequently suggesting the sweepstakes is not the main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're normally not tied to casino-style video games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the attributes typically related to McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes casinos offer" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the common payout percentage for a short-lived promotional sweepstakes is a minor share of the profits made by the business [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web cafes that sprang up in Florida, offering customers the possibility to play casino-style video games for real prizes. Many of those brick-and-mortar establishments have since been shuttered over accusations of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is among a number of star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to face comparable analysis.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have consistently been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as crucial consider identifying that a sweepstakes promo was in fact a guise for illegal sports betting.'

One of the gambling establishment market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being deprived of securities and states are forgoing significant tax and revenue opportunities as this gaming changes that carried out through controlled channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has actually signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent lawsuit, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'illegal gambling business. '

Apple and Google have likewise been named as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for comment.

'We generally do not talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com via e-mail. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games across many of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, producing not just terrific video games, user experiences and entertainment, but also ensuring this is done securely, properly and at the greatest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly common across the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to vigorously defend any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns in between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show problematic for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with traditional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues wish to predict a strong stance against illegal gaming - specifically when attempting to tamp down the occasional gambling scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting presumably prohibited gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also overlooked to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their star endorsers have a responsibility to explain to consumers the distinctions and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson stated. 'Some of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady prohibited gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is also some threat that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating prohibited gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton